https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283177 The Supreme Court held that the suit for dissolution and accounts of the partnership firm was maintainable under Section 69(2A) of the Indian Partnership Act. Despite the reconstitution of the partnership, the firm's registration remained valid, and the plaintiff's name was in the Register of Firms, meeting the statutory requirements. The court clarified that reconstitution does not necessitate fresh registration and failure to notify changes to the Registrar does not lead to deregistration. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision on the suit's maintainability. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:09:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283177 The Supreme Court held that the suit for dissolution and accounts of the partnership firm was maintainable under Section 69(2A) of the Indian Partnership Act. Despite the reconstitution of the partnership, the firm's registration remained valid, and the plaintiff's name was in the Register of Firms, meeting the statutory requirements. The court clarified that reconstitution does not necessitate fresh registration and failure to notify changes to the Registrar does not lead to deregistration. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision on the suit's maintainability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283177