https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385677 The Calcutta High Court dismissed the appeal (ITAT 245 of 2017) as it involved only questions of fact. The Commissioner (Appeals) had provided detailed factual reasons, including timely crediting of employees' share of provident fund. The Court refused to intervene and also rejected the related stay application (GA 2118 of 2017). en-us Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:57:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385677 The Calcutta High Court dismissed the appeal (ITAT 245 of 2017) as it involved only questions of fact. The Commissioner (Appeals) had provided detailed factual reasons, including timely crediting of employees' share of provident fund. The Court refused to intervene and also rejected the related stay application (GA 2118 of 2017). Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385677