<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 433 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385665</link>
    <description>Preventive detention of a person already in judicial custody is sustainable only where the detaining authority has reliable material showing a real and imminent possibility of release on bail and a likely continuation of prejudicial activity. A bare assertion of imminent release, without cogent supporting material or a pending bail application, is insufficient and amounts to ipse dixit. The commentary also notes that all germane material, including a witness&#039;s retraction petition, must be placed before and considered by the authority; omission of such material can render the subjective satisfaction incomplete and defective, exposing the detention order to challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 433 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385665</link>
      <description>Preventive detention of a person already in judicial custody is sustainable only where the detaining authority has reliable material showing a real and imminent possibility of release on bail and a likely continuation of prejudicial activity. A bare assertion of imminent release, without cogent supporting material or a pending bail application, is insufficient and amounts to ipse dixit. The commentary also notes that all germane material, including a witness&#039;s retraction petition, must be placed before and considered by the authority; omission of such material can render the subjective satisfaction incomplete and defective, exposing the detention order to challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>