<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 426 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the provisional attachment order and the adjudicating authority&#039;s order regarding the property in question. It concluded that the property purchased by the appellants was not linked to proceeds of crime and was acquired before any alleged offenses by Smt. Seema Garg&#039;s husband. All pending applications were disposed of without cost.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:56:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 426 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the provisional attachment order and the adjudicating authority&#039;s order regarding the property in question. It concluded that the property purchased by the appellants was not linked to proceeds of crime and was acquired before any alleged offenses by Smt. Seema Garg&#039;s husband. All pending applications were disposed of without cost.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>