<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 425 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385657</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the property (1180 sq. ft.) was not involved in money laundering and set aside the impugned order dated 04.02.2014. Consequently, the provisional attachment order dated 08.08.2013 was quashed, and the attachment was released forthwith. The tribunal reiterated that the ownership and title disputes should be resolved in a civil court. No costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:56:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 425 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385657</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the property (1180 sq. ft.) was not involved in money laundering and set aside the impugned order dated 04.02.2014. Consequently, the provisional attachment order dated 08.08.2013 was quashed, and the attachment was released forthwith. The tribunal reiterated that the ownership and title disputes should be resolved in a civil court. No costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>