https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385655 The court found that there was no violation of natural justice in the case, as the petitioners were granted sufficient opportunities for personal hearings and failed to avail themselves of these chances. The court highlighted the appeal remedy available to the petitioners and directed them to file an appeal within three months. The original order being lost during the writ petition process, the court instructed that the CESTAT should not require the original order for the appeal. The writ petition was closed with liberty to file an appeal before the CESTAT within the specified time, without imposing any costs. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:49:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385655 The court found that there was no violation of natural justice in the case, as the petitioners were granted sufficient opportunities for personal hearings and failed to avail themselves of these chances. The court highlighted the appeal remedy available to the petitioners and directed them to file an appeal within three months. The original order being lost during the writ petition process, the court instructed that the CESTAT should not require the original order for the appeal. The writ petition was closed with liberty to file an appeal before the CESTAT within the specified time, without imposing any costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385655