<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 414 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385646</link>
    <description>A section 9 insolvency application based on alleged unpaid lease rent was held not maintainable because a genuine pre-existing dispute existed over the lessor&#039;s contractual and statutory compliance, including approvals, occupancy certificate and permissions for commercial use. The dispute had been raised before the demand notice and was supported by allegations that the building lacked necessary permissions, with related criminal proceedings also pending. In summary proceedings, the tribunal would not decide contested questions of fact or law where entitlement itself was disputed, and the creditor failed to show an undisputed default. The application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 414 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385646</link>
      <description>A section 9 insolvency application based on alleged unpaid lease rent was held not maintainable because a genuine pre-existing dispute existed over the lessor&#039;s contractual and statutory compliance, including approvals, occupancy certificate and permissions for commercial use. The dispute had been raised before the demand notice and was supported by allegations that the building lacked necessary permissions, with related criminal proceedings also pending. In summary proceedings, the tribunal would not decide contested questions of fact or law where entitlement itself was disputed, and the creditor failed to show an undisputed default. The application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>