<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1190 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283159</link>
    <description>Time granted for compliance with the Tribunal-imposed pre-deposit condition was extended by three months. The extension was made conditional on filing an undertaking, and if immovable properties were sold during the extended period, the sale proceeds had to be applied towards the pre-deposit requirement. The operative effect was to preserve the compliance condition while allowing additional time for payment, subject to these safeguards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:15:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1190 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283159</link>
      <description>Time granted for compliance with the Tribunal-imposed pre-deposit condition was extended by three months. The extension was made conditional on filing an undertaking, and if immovable properties were sold during the extended period, the sale proceeds had to be applied towards the pre-deposit requirement. The operative effect was to preserve the compliance condition while allowing additional time for payment, subject to these safeguards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>