<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 763 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed all appeals, deleting significant additions made by the AO and upheld by the Ld.CIT(A). The Tribunal accepted the explanations and supporting documents provided by the assessees, resulting in the deletion of additions related to unexplained cash and unexplained investments in diamond jewellery. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the AO to provide consequential relief regarding the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 12:16:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 763 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed all appeals, deleting significant additions made by the AO and upheld by the Ld.CIT(A). The Tribunal accepted the explanations and supporting documents provided by the assessees, resulting in the deletion of additions related to unexplained cash and unexplained investments in diamond jewellery. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the AO to provide consequential relief regarding the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>