<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19672</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, allowing repair charges on the director&#039;s wife&#039;s car as a business expenditure. The court found the expenditure to be incidental to the business, aligning with a broader interpretation of &quot;for the purpose of business&quot; based on a Supreme Court precedent. The decision was supported by the director&#039;s use of the car for official duties and the occurrence of the loss within the business premises. Costs were awarded in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19672</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, allowing repair charges on the director&#039;s wife&#039;s car as a business expenditure. The court found the expenditure to be incidental to the business, aligning with a broader interpretation of &quot;for the purpose of business&quot; based on a Supreme Court precedent. The decision was supported by the director&#039;s use of the car for official duties and the occurrence of the loss within the business premises. Costs were awarded in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>