https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385640 The Court considered whether notice under Section 73(1) of the CGST Act was required before recovery of interest allegedly payable under Section 50. To avoid prejudice while that issue remained under consideration, it directed the respondents not to initiate any coercive recovery action against the petitioner until further orders. The order thus granted interim protection against coercive recovery and left the substantive question open for later determination. en-us Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385640 The Court considered whether notice under Section 73(1) of the CGST Act was required before recovery of interest allegedly payable under Section 50. To avoid prejudice while that issue remained under consideration, it directed the respondents not to initiate any coercive recovery action against the petitioner until further orders. The order thus granted interim protection against coercive recovery and left the substantive question open for later determination. Case-Laws GST Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385640