https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385625 The Tribunal found that the notice issued for recovery of dues, contrary to statutory provisions, was harassment and illegal. It emphasized that statutory bars on recovery should not be overridden by judicial orders. The jurisdictional authority's attempt to interpret orders beyond prescribed limits was criticized. The Tribunal imposed costs for wasting time and set aside the recovery notice, directing payment within a specified timeframe. The responsibility for cost recovery was assigned to the Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Kolhapur. en-us Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:04:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385625 The Tribunal found that the notice issued for recovery of dues, contrary to statutory provisions, was harassment and illegal. It emphasized that statutory bars on recovery should not be overridden by judicial orders. The jurisdictional authority's attempt to interpret orders beyond prescribed limits was criticized. The Tribunal imposed costs for wasting time and set aside the recovery notice, directing payment within a specified timeframe. The responsibility for cost recovery was assigned to the Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Kolhapur. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385625