https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385621 The court considered a challenge to orders under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, focusing on the lack of reasons provided for reopening notices under Section 150 of the Act. The petitioner argued the orders were unlawful due to the absence of reasons, citing GKN Driveshaft India Ltd. v/s. ITO. The Revenue defended the reopening based on an Appellate order directing reassessment within 12 months. The court stayed the orders pending further proceedings to assess the delay in compliance with the Appellate Authority's directions. en-us Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Sep 2019 14:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385621 The court considered a challenge to orders under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, focusing on the lack of reasons provided for reopening notices under Section 150 of the Act. The petitioner argued the orders were unlawful due to the absence of reasons, citing GKN Driveshaft India Ltd. v/s. ITO. The Revenue defended the reopening based on an Appellate order directing reassessment within 12 months. The court stayed the orders pending further proceedings to assess the delay in compliance with the Appellate Authority's directions. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385621