<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 382 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385614</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment, the disallowance of excessive claims under Section 35D, and the enhancement by the CIT(A). It confirmed that share premium is not part of &quot;capital employed&quot; for Section 35D and that the CIT(A) has the jurisdiction to enhance assessments, including reassessments. The appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:02:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 382 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385614</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment, the disallowance of excessive claims under Section 35D, and the enhancement by the CIT(A). It confirmed that share premium is not part of &quot;capital employed&quot; for Section 35D and that the CIT(A) has the jurisdiction to enhance assessments, including reassessments. The appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>