<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 378 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, deleting the additions made by the AO towards the balance in the HSBC Bank, Geneva, in the names of Ruby Enterprises Inc. and White Cedar Investments Ltd. under section 69A of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of incriminating material found during the search to justify additions under section 153A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:02:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 378 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, deleting the additions made by the AO towards the balance in the HSBC Bank, Geneva, in the names of Ruby Enterprises Inc. and White Cedar Investments Ltd. under section 69A of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of incriminating material found during the search to justify additions under section 153A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>