<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 368 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385600</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with the primary issue of excess sugarcane price and other related matters remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh determination. The Assessees were granted a reasonable opportunity of hearing, and the AO was directed to consider all relevant facts and legal precedents in making the determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 368 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385600</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with the primary issue of excess sugarcane price and other related matters remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh determination. The Assessees were granted a reasonable opportunity of hearing, and the AO was directed to consider all relevant facts and legal precedents in making the determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>