https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385595 The court upheld the petitioner's contention regarding the denial of cross-examination, finding a violation of natural justice principles. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside. The other objections raised by the petitioner were rejected, and the court clarified that the time limits in Regulation 20(7) are directory. The writ petition was allowed, and there were no orders as to costs. en-us Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385595 The court upheld the petitioner's contention regarding the denial of cross-examination, finding a violation of natural justice principles. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside. The other objections raised by the petitioner were rejected, and the court clarified that the time limits in Regulation 20(7) are directory. The writ petition was allowed, and there were no orders as to costs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385595