<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 40 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19661</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s power to rectify its order under section 254(2) was treated as a question of law arising from its order, and the High Court found that issue fit for reference. On that basis, the Tribunal was directed to refer the stated question of law together with the statement of case under section 256(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:52:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 40 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19661</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s power to rectify its order under section 254(2) was treated as a question of law arising from its order, and the High Court found that issue fit for reference. On that basis, the Tribunal was directed to refer the stated question of law together with the statement of case under section 256(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>