<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1482 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283130</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld the fee determination for the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) as per the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, following the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s directives. The appeal against the fee fixation was dismissed, emphasizing compliance with fee determination processes. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected a review application for lack of apparent errors or new facts in the previous order, highlighting the stringent criteria for review consideration. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to fee determination guidelines for IRPs and the need for clear grounds to support review applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 12:25:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1482 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283130</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld the fee determination for the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) as per the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, following the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s directives. The appeal against the fee fixation was dismissed, emphasizing compliance with fee determination processes. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected a review application for lack of apparent errors or new facts in the previous order, highlighting the stringent criteria for review consideration. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to fee determination guidelines for IRPs and the need for clear grounds to support review applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>