<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 357 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385589</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the power to examine on oath and the use of statements in assessments. However, it favored the revenue on the evidentiary value of such statements. The assessment in the case was not solely based on the sworn statement but also considered other evidence. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s findings were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 357 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385589</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the power to examine on oath and the use of statements in assessments. However, it favored the revenue on the evidentiary value of such statements. The assessment in the case was not solely based on the sworn statement but also considered other evidence. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s findings were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>