<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 349 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385581</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes in relation to capital gains and exemption under section 54, while allowing the appeal on penalty matters. The judgment emphasized the need for a thorough re-examination of the issues in light of relevant legal provisions and case laws. The matter was restored to the Ld. CIT(A) for re-decision regarding the exemption claim under section 54 and penalty under section 271(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 08:13:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 349 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385581</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes in relation to capital gains and exemption under section 54, while allowing the appeal on penalty matters. The judgment emphasized the need for a thorough re-examination of the issues in light of relevant legal provisions and case laws. The matter was restored to the Ld. CIT(A) for re-decision regarding the exemption claim under section 54 and penalty under section 271(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>