<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules &quot;Action&quot; Means &quot;Prosecution&quot; in Section 140(5) of Companies Act, Affecting Auditor Removal Cases.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49184</link>
    <description>Proceedings against the auditors of the company - removal from the statutory audit- Constitutional validity of sub-section (5) of Section 140 of the Companies Act, 2013 - the word “action” in the second proviso to sub-section (5) of section 140 of the Act, would be required to be read down as “prosecution”. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 08:10:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 08:10:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules &quot;Action&quot; Means &quot;Prosecution&quot; in Section 140(5) of Companies Act, Affecting Auditor Removal Cases.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49184</link>
      <description>Proceedings against the auditors of the company - removal from the statutory audit- Constitutional validity of sub-section (5) of Section 140 of the Companies Act, 2013 - the word “action” in the second proviso to sub-section (5) of section 140 of the Act, would be required to be read down as “prosecution”. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 08:10:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>