<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 327 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385559</link>
    <description>A Central Excise Special Leave Petition was disposed of after the petitioner accepted that the amount involved was below the Rs. 2 crore threshold covered by the communication dated 22.08.2019. The Supreme Court therefore treated the matter as falling within that administrative instruction and did not examine the merits, leaving the questions of law open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 07:39:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 327 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385559</link>
      <description>A Central Excise Special Leave Petition was disposed of after the petitioner accepted that the amount involved was below the Rs. 2 crore threshold covered by the communication dated 22.08.2019. The Supreme Court therefore treated the matter as falling within that administrative instruction and did not examine the merits, leaving the questions of law open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>