<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 321 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385553</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and the District Judge&#039;s order. It directed that the disputes between the respondents and the appellants be referred to arbitration as per Clause 19 of the Addendum. The Court emphasized that the arbitration clause should be given effect, ensuring that the disputes arising out of or in connection with the agreements are resolved through arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 321 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385553</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and the District Judge&#039;s order. It directed that the disputes between the respondents and the appellants be referred to arbitration as per Clause 19 of the Addendum. The Court emphasized that the arbitration clause should be given effect, ensuring that the disputes arising out of or in connection with the agreements are resolved through arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>