<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 321 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385553</link>
    <description>A dispute over sharing of lease rent from project space, founded on the development agreements and addendum, fell within the parties&#039; arbitration clause because Clause 19 covered disputes arising out of, in connection with, or relating to the agreement. The sub-clauses only prescribed different procedural arrangements depending on the category of dispute and did not narrow that broad coverage. The SC held that the claim was sufficiently connected with the contractual arrangements and therefore arbitrable, so the applications under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 should have been allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 321 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385553</link>
      <description>A dispute over sharing of lease rent from project space, founded on the development agreements and addendum, fell within the parties&#039; arbitration clause because Clause 19 covered disputes arising out of, in connection with, or relating to the agreement. The sub-clauses only prescribed different procedural arrangements depending on the category of dispute and did not narrow that broad coverage. The SC held that the claim was sufficiently connected with the contractual arrangements and therefore arbitrable, so the applications under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 should have been allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>