<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1695 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283126</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed the need for a certificate of service for multiple respondents in different cases, awaiting the certificate from the High Court. It also noted the denial of an opportunity to file a counter affidavit for the sole respondent in one case. Non-payment of Ad-valorem court fee was highlighted, with concerns raised over non-compliance by the appellant&#039;s counsel. Instructions were given to process the matter for listing before the Hon&#039;ble Judge in Chambers. Additionally, cases involving completed service with no appearance, compliance with filing requirements, and granting time for affidavit and court fee submission were discussed, emphasizing procedural steps and deadlines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2019 06:34:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1695 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283126</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed the need for a certificate of service for multiple respondents in different cases, awaiting the certificate from the High Court. It also noted the denial of an opportunity to file a counter affidavit for the sole respondent in one case. Non-payment of Ad-valorem court fee was highlighted, with concerns raised over non-compliance by the appellant&#039;s counsel. Instructions were given to process the matter for listing before the Hon&#039;ble Judge in Chambers. Additionally, cases involving completed service with no appearance, compliance with filing requirements, and granting time for affidavit and court fee submission were discussed, emphasizing procedural steps and deadlines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>