https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283119 The court rejected all contentions raised by the petitioner-Society. It upheld the right to fair consideration for membership, the eligibility of Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) as members, the validity of Rule 12(2) of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Rules, and the substantial compliance with bye-laws for membership and transfer. The court found no merit in the petitioner-Society's claim for entitlement to 50% of the premium from a plot transfer. The impugned orders by the District Registrar and Joint Registrar were deemed lawful, leading to the dismissal of the Special Civil Application with the interim order extended for eight weeks. en-us Mon, 01 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Sep 2019 16:25:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283119 The court rejected all contentions raised by the petitioner-Society. It upheld the right to fair consideration for membership, the eligibility of Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) as members, the validity of Rule 12(2) of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Rules, and the substantial compliance with bye-laws for membership and transfer. The court found no merit in the petitioner-Society's claim for entitlement to 50% of the premium from a plot transfer. The impugned orders by the District Registrar and Joint Registrar were deemed lawful, leading to the dismissal of the Special Civil Application with the interim order extended for eight weeks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283119