<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 312 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283119</link>
    <description>A co-operative housing society does not have an absolute right to refuse membership, and consideration of membership must be fair; refusal on flimsy grounds remains challengeable. A Hindu undivided family was treated as eligible to become a member, as the statutory scheme and bye-laws did not prohibit such membership. Rule 12(2) of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Rules, 1965 was upheld as a valid regulatory measure that did not destroy the freedom of association. The transfer and membership documents were found to have substantially complied with the applicable requirements, and the authorities&#039; orders admitting the transferee and recognising the transfer were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 16:25:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 312 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283119</link>
      <description>A co-operative housing society does not have an absolute right to refuse membership, and consideration of membership must be fair; refusal on flimsy grounds remains challengeable. A Hindu undivided family was treated as eligible to become a member, as the statutory scheme and bye-laws did not prohibit such membership. Rule 12(2) of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Rules, 1965 was upheld as a valid regulatory measure that did not destroy the freedom of association. The transfer and membership documents were found to have substantially complied with the applicable requirements, and the authorities&#039; orders admitting the transferee and recognising the transfer were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>