<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1656 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the activities of the trust, including providing sports facilities, were aligned with its objectives and had been considered charitable in the past. The Tribunal ruled that the registration could not be cancelled solely based on the proviso to section 2(15) and directed the DIT(E) to grant registration, citing a precedent from the Bombay High Court. The order was pronounced on 15-06-2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 14:33:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1656 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the activities of the trust, including providing sports facilities, were aligned with its objectives and had been considered charitable in the past. The Tribunal ruled that the registration could not be cancelled solely based on the proviso to section 2(15) and directed the DIT(E) to grant registration, citing a precedent from the Bombay High Court. The order was pronounced on 15-06-2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>