https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283110 High Court inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings may be invoked through a subsequent application when materially changed circumstances justify reconsideration, notwithstanding rejection of an earlier application for the same relief. The preservative power under Section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure operates with reference to circumstances existing when the later application is made. Prolonged prosecutorial stagnation and absence of material disclosing a prima facie case may constitute abuse of process and justify quashing to secure the ends of justice. The subsequent application was competent, and quashing was sustained. en-us Tue, 08 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Sep 2019 12:16:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283110 High Court inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings may be invoked through a subsequent application when materially changed circumstances justify reconsideration, notwithstanding rejection of an earlier application for the same relief. The preservative power under Section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure operates with reference to circumstances existing when the later application is made. Prolonged prosecutorial stagnation and absence of material disclosing a prima facie case may constitute abuse of process and justify quashing to secure the ends of justice. The subsequent application was competent, and quashing was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283110