https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283109 Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to secure a de facto review of a final order when the same facts and materials are placed again before the court. Section 362 bars alteration or review of a final order except for clerical or arithmetical correction, so a fresh application raising no changed circumstances is not maintainable. On the record, the earlier finding that cognizance had already been taken before transfer of the case could not be reopened through a second section 482 application. The High Court erred in quashing the proceedings by effectively reviewing its earlier order. en-us Fri, 02 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Sep 2019 12:10:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283109 Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to secure a de facto review of a final order when the same facts and materials are placed again before the court. Section 362 bars alteration or review of a final order except for clerical or arithmetical correction, so a fresh application raising no changed circumstances is not maintainable. On the record, the earlier finding that cognizance had already been taken before transfer of the case could not be reopened through a second section 482 application. The High Court erred in quashing the proceedings by effectively reviewing its earlier order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283109