<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1325 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283103</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad upheld the liability of a car dealer to pay service tax on commissions received from banks and financial institutions for selling loan products in their showroom. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, citing the precedent set by the Larger Bench in the Pagariya Auto Center case, which established that such commissions are subject to service tax under Business Auxiliary Services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 11:37:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1325 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283103</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad upheld the liability of a car dealer to pay service tax on commissions received from banks and financial institutions for selling loan products in their showroom. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, citing the precedent set by the Larger Bench in the Pagariya Auto Center case, which established that such commissions are subject to service tax under Business Auxiliary Services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>