<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 302 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385534</link>
    <description>A Cyprus-incorporated assessee held a valid tax residency certificate, invested in compulsorily convertible debentures on its own account, and retained control over the interest received. On these facts, it was treated as the beneficial owner because there was no contractual, legal, or economic obligation to pass the income to another person, and shareholder funding alone did not negate beneficial ownership. The revenue also failed to show any lack of exclusive possession, control, or economic substance. Treaty relief under Article 11 of the India-Cyprus DTAA was therefore available, and denial of the beneficial rate was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 302 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385534</link>
      <description>A Cyprus-incorporated assessee held a valid tax residency certificate, invested in compulsorily convertible debentures on its own account, and retained control over the interest received. On these facts, it was treated as the beneficial owner because there was no contractual, legal, or economic obligation to pass the income to another person, and shareholder funding alone did not negate beneficial ownership. The revenue also failed to show any lack of exclusive possession, control, or economic substance. Treaty relief under Article 11 of the India-Cyprus DTAA was therefore available, and denial of the beneficial rate was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>