<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 296 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385528</link>
    <description>The ITAT confirmed the addition of undisclosed purchase price for society plots made by the A.O., based on values determined by JDA and Sub-Registrar records. The addition was upheld due to incriminating material found during the search, despite arguments against cost inflation benefits and lack of incriminating evidence. The decision was rendered on 20th August 2019, allowing the appeals in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 296 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385528</link>
      <description>The ITAT confirmed the addition of undisclosed purchase price for society plots made by the A.O., based on values determined by JDA and Sub-Registrar records. The addition was upheld due to incriminating material found during the search, despite arguments against cost inflation benefits and lack of incriminating evidence. The decision was rendered on 20th August 2019, allowing the appeals in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>