<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 289 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385521</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed. It found no evidence supporting the import of discs, rejecting claims of misclassification by the Revenue. Emphasizing the importance of independent corroboration of statements and examining evidence for voluntariness and truthfulness, the tribunal concluded that the lack of evidence supporting the mis-declaration led to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 289 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385521</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed. It found no evidence supporting the import of discs, rejecting claims of misclassification by the Revenue. Emphasizing the importance of independent corroboration of statements and examining evidence for voluntariness and truthfulness, the tribunal concluded that the lack of evidence supporting the mis-declaration led to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>