<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 288 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of confiscation and enhancement of value of imported goods but reduced the redemption fine and personal penalty. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) appropriate based on the precedent set by the Three Member Bench of CESTAT Delhi. The Stay Petitions were disposed of, and the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the lower authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 06:54:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 288 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of confiscation and enhancement of value of imported goods but reduced the redemption fine and personal penalty. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) appropriate based on the precedent set by the Three Member Bench of CESTAT Delhi. The Stay Petitions were disposed of, and the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the lower authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>