<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 286 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385518</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in money-laundering prosecutions was described as an extraordinary remedy to be granted sparingly, especially where allegations disclose serious economic offences, custodial interrogation is needed, and investigation may be impeded. The statutory safeguards under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 were noted, and pre-arrest bail was said to be unwarranted on the facts. The Court also held that investigation materials may be perused in sealed cover for the limited purpose of deciding bail, but the accused has no right to demand prior disclosure of such material or interrogation transcripts, as that would amount to a mini trial and could hamper investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 286 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385518</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in money-laundering prosecutions was described as an extraordinary remedy to be granted sparingly, especially where allegations disclose serious economic offences, custodial interrogation is needed, and investigation may be impeded. The statutory safeguards under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 were noted, and pre-arrest bail was said to be unwarranted on the facts. The Court also held that investigation materials may be perused in sealed cover for the limited purpose of deciding bail, but the accused has no right to demand prior disclosure of such material or interrogation transcripts, as that would amount to a mini trial and could hamper investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>