<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Service Tax Recovery Valid as Land Revenue: Certificate&#039;s Validity Upheld Despite Missing Specific Statute Reference u/s 87(D).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49167</link>
    <description>Recovery of service tax with interest and penalty as land revenue - mere reference to Section 11 (without even reference to the statute) would not vitiate the Certificate itself. Clearly, the provisions of Section 87 (D) provide for the drawing-up of a certificate for tax arrears and that is what has been done in the present case - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 06:54:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 06:54:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Service Tax Recovery Valid as Land Revenue: Certificate&#039;s Validity Upheld Despite Missing Specific Statute Reference u/s 87(D).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49167</link>
      <description>Recovery of service tax with interest and penalty as land revenue - mere reference to Section 11 (without even reference to the statute) would not vitiate the Certificate itself. Clearly, the provisions of Section 87 (D) provide for the drawing-up of a certificate for tax arrears and that is what has been done in the present case - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 06:54:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>