<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 280 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385512</link>
    <description>The court held that there was no violation of natural justice principles in the order passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise, Madurai. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to file an appeal before the CESTAT within the specified timeframe under Section 35(B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory appeal provisions and allowed the petitioner to proceed with the appeal. The lost original order issue was addressed, permitting the use of reconstructed writ petition papers for filing the appeal. No costs were imposed on either party, and the writ petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 06:53:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 280 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385512</link>
      <description>The court held that there was no violation of natural justice principles in the order passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise, Madurai. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to file an appeal before the CESTAT within the specified timeframe under Section 35(B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory appeal provisions and allowed the petitioner to proceed with the appeal. The lost original order issue was addressed, permitting the use of reconstructed writ petition papers for filing the appeal. No costs were imposed on either party, and the writ petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>