<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1774 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283100</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court found no reason to reconsider its earlier judgment in the connected central excise matters. The review petitions were therefore dismissed, leaving the prior dismissal of the civil appeals undisturbed. The order reflects the narrow scope of review jurisdiction, which does not permit rehearing absent a legally sustainable ground for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:16:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1774 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283100</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court found no reason to reconsider its earlier judgment in the connected central excise matters. The review petitions were therefore dismissed, leaving the prior dismissal of the civil appeals undisturbed. The order reflects the narrow scope of review jurisdiction, which does not permit rehearing absent a legally sustainable ground for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>