<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1920 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan filed by the Insolvency Resolution Professional, leading to the discharge of duties. Concerns raised by Operational Creditors regarding outstanding dues were noted, with the plan addressing settlement terms. Despite claims filed beyond the prescribed period, the plan accounted for all claims, including disputed and contingent liabilities. The Tribunal found the plan satisfactory, declining to interfere with the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, emphasizing the Committee of Creditors&#039; discretion in determining claim amounts. The appeals were dismissed, with no interference in pending litigations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:12:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1920 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan filed by the Insolvency Resolution Professional, leading to the discharge of duties. Concerns raised by Operational Creditors regarding outstanding dues were noted, with the plan addressing settlement terms. Despite claims filed beyond the prescribed period, the plan accounted for all claims, including disputed and contingent liabilities. The Tribunal found the plan satisfactory, declining to interfere with the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, emphasizing the Committee of Creditors&#039; discretion in determining claim amounts. The appeals were dismissed, with no interference in pending litigations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>