<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1355 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283080</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal as the penalty orders imposed under sections 271(1)(c) and 41(1) of the Income Tax Act were cancelled due to being barred by limitation. The Tribunal found that the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) was passed beyond the specified deadline, leading to its cancellation. As a result, the penalties were deemed void ab initio, and the Tribunal did not address the original grounds raised by the appellant regarding the penalties&#039; merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 12:51:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1355 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283080</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal as the penalty orders imposed under sections 271(1)(c) and 41(1) of the Income Tax Act were cancelled due to being barred by limitation. The Tribunal found that the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) was passed beyond the specified deadline, leading to its cancellation. As a result, the penalties were deemed void ab initio, and the Tribunal did not address the original grounds raised by the appellant regarding the penalties&#039; merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>