https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385500 An ongoing works contract that began before GST but continued after GST came into force was treated as governed by the applicable Government Order on works-contract GST. Because the applicable tax rate was not disputed, the dispute was confined to how liability should be borne and quantified. The text states that paragraph 10(a) and paragraph 12 of G.O.Ms.No.296, Finance [Salaries] Department dated 09.10.2017, applied to such contracts, and that quantification was to be completed expeditiously without affecting the ongoing work. en-us Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385500 An ongoing works contract that began before GST but continued after GST came into force was treated as governed by the applicable Government Order on works-contract GST. Because the applicable tax rate was not disputed, the dispute was confined to how liability should be borne and quantified. The text states that paragraph 10(a) and paragraph 12 of G.O.Ms.No.296, Finance [Salaries] Department dated 09.10.2017, applied to such contracts, and that quantification was to be completed expeditiously without affecting the ongoing work. Case-Laws GST Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385500