<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 253 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385485</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer for both the travelling and business promotion expenses, as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that these expenses were wholly and exclusively for business purposes. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 07:28:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 253 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385485</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer for both the travelling and business promotion expenses, as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that these expenses were wholly and exclusively for business purposes. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>