<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 241 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385473</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur, and the sustainability of the demand. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur, lacked jurisdiction to issue the demand as the appellant had obtained Centralised Registration in Delhi. Due to this jurisdictional issue, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the significance of jurisdictional compliance in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 241 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385473</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur, and the sustainability of the demand. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur, lacked jurisdiction to issue the demand as the appellant had obtained Centralised Registration in Delhi. Due to this jurisdictional issue, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the significance of jurisdictional compliance in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>