https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385466 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order of compulsory retirement, emphasizing the availability of alternative remedies under Article 226 and the discretionary nature of extraordinary jurisdiction. The court found the order not patently erroneous or perverse, leading to the dismissal of the petition. Additionally, the claim for damages and violation of fundamental rights was rejected, highlighting the inability to challenge the retirement order based on inferences alone and the availability of statutory and civil remedies. The court distinguished previous cases cited by the petitioner and dismissed the petition as non-maintainable. en-us Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Sep 2019 15:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385466 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order of compulsory retirement, emphasizing the availability of alternative remedies under Article 226 and the discretionary nature of extraordinary jurisdiction. The court found the order not patently erroneous or perverse, leading to the dismissal of the petition. Additionally, the claim for damages and violation of fundamental rights was rejected, highlighting the inability to challenge the retirement order based on inferences alone and the availability of statutory and civil remedies. The court distinguished previous cases cited by the petitioner and dismissed the petition as non-maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385466