<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 228 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385460</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the applications for condonation of delay, set aside the impugned orders, and directed that the settlement applications be decided on merits. Adjudication orders passed after the filing of settlement applications were deemed invalid. The writ petition was allowed and disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 07:24:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 228 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385460</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the applications for condonation of delay, set aside the impugned orders, and directed that the settlement applications be decided on merits. Adjudication orders passed after the filing of settlement applications were deemed invalid. The writ petition was allowed and disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>