<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 225 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385457</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal without costs, emphasizing the limited role of the Resolution Professional in deciding ownership disputes over hypothecated goods and the importance of raising such issues post the moratorium period. The decision underscores the need for active participation by parties in proceedings to effectively present their claims for relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 225 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385457</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal without costs, emphasizing the limited role of the Resolution Professional in deciding ownership disputes over hypothecated goods and the importance of raising such issues post the moratorium period. The decision underscores the need for active participation by parties in proceedings to effectively present their claims for relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>