<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 222 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385454</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand and impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits. It emphasized the importance of consistent application of tax laws and accurate interpretation of agreements to determine tax liability for services rendered. The judgment stressed the need for uniformity in tax assessments and highlighted the significance of avoiding inconsistent treatment in similar situations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 222 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385454</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand and impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits. It emphasized the importance of consistent application of tax laws and accurate interpretation of agreements to determine tax liability for services rendered. The judgment stressed the need for uniformity in tax assessments and highlighted the significance of avoiding inconsistent treatment in similar situations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>