<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 219 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385451</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeals. The decision was based on various legal principles, including the computation of duty liability as per Central Excise Valuation Rules, challenges to the show cause notice, and the application of the res judicata principle to prevent repeated proceedings against the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized that subjecting the appellant to multiple proceedings for the same period was not in accordance with the law, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 219 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385451</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeals. The decision was based on various legal principles, including the computation of duty liability as per Central Excise Valuation Rules, challenges to the show cause notice, and the application of the res judicata principle to prevent repeated proceedings against the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized that subjecting the appellant to multiple proceedings for the same period was not in accordance with the law, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>