<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 218 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in a case concerning the alleged clandestine manufacturing and clearance of Hellogen Bulbs without duty payment by the appellant&#039;s Unit-II. The decision was based on insufficient evidence supporting the allegations, particularly in light of a Coordinate Bench&#039;s findings in a related case. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 218 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in a case concerning the alleged clandestine manufacturing and clearance of Hellogen Bulbs without duty payment by the appellant&#039;s Unit-II. The decision was based on insufficient evidence supporting the allegations, particularly in light of a Coordinate Bench&#039;s findings in a related case. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>