<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (11) TMI 98 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283068</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the preference shareholders, affirming their entitlement to arrears of cumulative dividends up to the commencement of winding up, in priority to equity shareholders, as per Article 7 of the Articles of Association. The Liquidator&#039;s reference was decided against the company, with costs to be covered by the company&#039;s funds, while other parties were to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 17:33:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (11) TMI 98 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283068</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the preference shareholders, affirming their entitlement to arrears of cumulative dividends up to the commencement of winding up, in priority to equity shareholders, as per Article 7 of the Articles of Association. The Liquidator&#039;s reference was decided against the company, with costs to be covered by the company&#039;s funds, while other parties were to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>